- Bill introduced in the Commons by1st reading in the Commons
- Bill 156 2022-23 (as introduced)
- Bill 156 2022-23 (as introduced) - large print
- Bill 156 EN 2022-23
- Bill 156 EN 2022-23 - large print
- Human Rights Memorandum from the Cabinet Office
- Memorandum from the Cabinet Office to the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee
- Equality Impact Assessment from the Cabinet Office
- Briefing Paper on the Bill
- 2nd reading, Programme motion, Money resolution, Ways and Means resolution in the CommonsView in Hansard ↗49 speakers · 161 speechesDivision #73Second ReadingAyes 280Noes 225Division #74Programme MotionAyes 270Noes 45Division #75MoneyAyes 265Noes 44Division #76Ways and MeansAyes 260Noes 42nd reading, Programme motion, Money resolution, Ways and Means resolution in the CommonsView in Hansard ↗8 speakers · 20 speeches
- Call for written evidence: Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill
- Programme motion in the Commons
- 20 amendments tabled at Committee stage in the Commons2 Not selected7 Withdrawn2 Agreed7 Not called2 Negatived on division
- Written evidence submitted by The Law Society of Scotland (REULB02)
- Written evidence submitted by Employment Lawyers Association ('ELA') (REULB04)
- Written evidence submitted by the Bar Council (REULB05)
- Written evidence submitted by the RSPCA (REULB06)
- Written evidence submitted by the NFU (REULB07)
- Written evidence submitted by the New Forest National Park Authority (REULB08)
- Written evidence submitted by Dr Martin Brenncke (REULB09)
- Written evidence submitted by Consumer Scotland (REULB13)
- Written evidence submitted by Lewis Silkin LLP (REULB14)
- Written evidence submitted by The Wildlife Trusts (REULB15)
- Written evidence submitted by Catherine Barnard, Professor of Law, University of Cambridge, and Deputy Director, UK in a Changing Europe, and Dr Joelle Grogan, senior researcher, UK in a Changing Europe (REULB21)
- Written evidence submitted by Professor Charlotte Villiers, Professor of Company Law and Corporate Governance, University of Bristol Law School (REULB01)
- Written evidence submitted by Equally Ours (REULB03)
- Written evidence submitted by the Civil Society Alliance (REULB10)
- Written evidence submitted by Professor Maria Lee (REULB11)
- Written evidence submitted by the BRC (British Retail Consortium) (REULB12)
- Written evidence submitted by the Hansard Society (REULB16)
- Written evidence submitted by the PETRA Network (REULB17)
- Written evidence submitted by Harold Shupak (REULB18)
- Written evidence submitted by the Suffolk Coastal Port Health Authority (REULB19)
- Written evidence submitted by a working mother from Cambridge (REULB20)
- Letter from Nusrat Ghani MP to Gary Streeter MP and George Howarth MP regarding the work conducted by the Brexit Opportunities Unit and The National Archives to identify retained EU law (REUL), as discussed during the Public Bill Committee evidence session of the Bill.
- Written evidence submitted by Professor James Lee (REULB23)
- Written evidence submitted by Ian Wood (REULB24)
- Written evidence submitted by the Independent Monitoring Authority for the Citizens' Rights Agreements ("the IMA") (REULB30)
- Written evidence submitted by Dr Viviane Gravey, Senior Lecturer in European Politics, Queen's University Belfast, and co-chairs of Brexit and Environment, an ESRC funded network of academics investigating the impact of Brexit on the environment (supplementary evidence) (REULB32)
- Written evidence submitted by William Wilson, Barrister, Wyeside Consulting Ltd (REULB33)
- Written evidence submitted by The Angling Trust (REULB34)
- Written evidence submitted by Which? (REULB35)
- Written evidence submitted by the International Meat Trade Association (IMTA) (REULB36)
- Written evidence submitted by the City of London Corporation (REULB38)
- Written evidence submitted by John Bell LLM (REULB41)
- Written evidence submitted by the Planning and Environmental Bar Association (REULB42)
- Written evidence submitted by the Institute for European Environmental Policy UK (IEEP UK) (REULB43)
- Written evidence submitted by the Labour Exploitation Advisory Group (LEAG), the Anti-Trafficking and Labour Exploitation Unit (ATLEU), and Hope for Justice (REULB44)
- Written evidence submitted by Ernst and Young LLP (REULB45)
- Written evidence submitted by the Office for Environmental Protection (OEP) (REULB46)
- Written evidence submitted by the British Copyright Council (REULB48)
- Written evidence submitted by JUSTICE (REULB50)
- Written evidence submitted by the Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law, British Institute of International and Comparative Law (BIICL), co-authored by Dr Oliver Garner and Dr Julian Ghosh KC (REULB51)
- Written evidence submitted by The Society for Radiological Protection (REULB54)
- Written evidence submitted by the Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd (CLA) (REULB55)
- Written evidence submitted by The Law Society of Scotland (further submission) (REULB56)
- Written evidence submitted by UK Music (REULB57)
- Written evidence submitted by ESB Generation and Trading (REULB58)
- Written evidence submitted by the IP Federation (REULB59)
- Written evidence submitted by Acas (the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service) (REULB61)
- Written evidence submitted by the Chartered Institute of Environmental Health (CIEH) (REULB64)
- Written evidence submitted by CIWM (REULB65)
- Written evidence submitted by the British Standards Institution (BSI) (REULB66)
- Written evidence submitted by the Border Reform and Research Group (BRRG) (REULB68)
- Written evidence submitted by the Health Food Manufacturers' Association (REULB73)
- Written evidence submitted by the Institute of Acoustics (REULB76)
- Written evidence submitted by the UK Environmental Law Association (UKELA) (REULB77)
- Written evidence submitted by the Institute of Food Science and Technology (REULB79)
- Written evidence submitted by National Parks England (REULB22)
- Written evidence submitted by Glasgow Loves EU (REULB25)
- Written evidence submitted by Social Care Institute for Excellence (SCIE) (REULB26)
- Written evidence submitted by the National Trust (REULB27)
- Written evidence submitted by the Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (IPEM) (REULB28)
- Written evidence submitted by TheCityUK (REULB29)
- Written evidence submitted by the Chartered Trading Standards Institute (CTSI) (REULB31)
- Written evidence submitted by John Ratcliffe (REULB37)
- Written evidence submitted by Energy UK (REULB39)
- Written evidence submitted by academic experts from both the University of Oxford and University of Aberdeen who are associated with the Leverhulme Centre for Nature Recovery (REULB40)
- Written evidence submitted by UNISON (supplementary submission) (REULB47)
- Written evidence submitted by The Chartered Institute of Trade Mark Attorneys (CITMA) (REULB49)
- Written evidence submitted by The UK Musicians' Union (REULB52)
- Written evidence submitted by Charles Whitmore, Research Associate, Cardiff University - Wales Governance Centre and Wales Council for Voluntary Action (supplementary submission) (REULB53)
- Written evidence submitted by Sussex Wildlife Trust's Storrington and Arun Valley Regional Group (REULB60)
- Written evidence submitted by Make UK (REULB62)
- Written evidence submitted by Friends of the Earth England, Wales and Northern Ireland (REULB63)
- Written evidence submitted by the UK Metric Association (REULB67)
- Written evidence submitted by Ms Vivian Doussy (REULB69)
- Written evidence submitted by Christine Lindsay (REULB70)
- Written evidence submitted by Mrs Suzanne Ewers (REULB71)
- Written evidence submitted by the United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS) (REULB72)
- Written evidence submitted by Exeter XR Biodiversity Working Group (REULB74)
- Written evidence submitted by Cruelty Free International (REULB75)
- Written evidence submitted by Directors UK (REULB78)
- Written evidence submitted by the BMA (British Medical Association) (REULB80)
- Written evidence submitted by the TUC (REULB81)
- Written evidence submitted by the Welsh Government (REULB82)
- Written evidence submitted by the British Chambers of Commerce (REULB83)
- Written evidence submitted by the UK Industry Working Group on Probiotics (REULB84)
- Written evidence submitted by the Human Rights Consortium (REULB85)
- Written evidence submitted by the Law Society of England and Wales (REULB86)
- Written evidence submitted by Professor Jo Hunt, Cardiff School of Law and Politics, Wales Governance Centre (REULB87)
- Supplementary written evidence submitted by Bates Wells (REULB88)
- Written evidence submitted by the Regulatory Policy Committee (REULB89)
- Written evidence submitted by Sharon Leclercq-Spooner (REULB90)
- Written evidence submitted by the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (REULB91)
- Written evidence submitted by Meta (REULB92)
- Bill 204 2022-23 (as amended in Public Bill Committee)
- Bill 204 2022-23 (as amended in Public Bill Committee) - large print
- Written evidence submitted by Food and Safety, East Suffolk Council (REULB93)
- Written evidence submitted by ClientEarth (REULB94)
- Written evidence submitted by the Access Industry Forum (AIF) (REULB95)
- Written evidence submitted by the No Falls Foundation (REULB96)
- Written evidence submitted by the BMA (British Medical Association) (further submission) (REULB97)
- Written evidence submitted by Greener UK and Wildlife and Countryside Link (REULB98)
- Impact Assessment from the Cabinet Office
- Briefing paper on progress of the Bill
- Report stage, 3rd reading in the CommonsView in Hansard ↗58 speakers · 206 speechesDivision #150Third ReadingAyes 297Noes 238
- 1st reading in the LordsView in Hansard ↗
Formal stage — recorded in Hansard.
- Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill: HL Bill 89
- 25th Report of the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee
- 28th Report of the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee
- 13th Report of the Select Committee on the Constitution
- 20 amendments tabled at Committee stage in the Lords2 Stood part15 Not moved2 Withdrawn1 Withdrawn before debate
- Letter from Baroness Bloomfield to all Peers regarding points raised in the committee stage debate: product safety review, definition of regulatory burden and clause 15(5), Impact assessment for the Bill and IAs for changes to retained EU law, retained EU law dashboard, creative industries, preserving and reforming retained EU law using the Bill powers.
- Letter from Baroness Bloomfield regarding questions raised in the Common Frameworks Scrutiny Committee Report debate: interaction of Common Frameworks and the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill, operation of the communique within government, updating the Frameworks analysis, and ongoing engagement with the Committee.
- Letter from Lord Callanan, Lord Benyon, Baroness Neville-Rolfe and Baroness Bloomfield to Lords regarding points and questions raised during the Committee stage of the Bill: the aviation consumer policy reform consultation, interpretive effects and case law, exclusions and commons frameworks.
- Letter from Baroness Neville-Rolfe to all Peers regarding points raised in the committee stage (fourth day): methodology of identifying retained EU law, and safeguards in place on the power under Clause 15.
- Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill: Supplementary Delegated Powers Memorandum
- 39th Report of Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee
- 33rd Report of the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee
- Letter from Lord Callanan to Peers regarding the publication of an explanation of each piece of legislation listed in the revocation Schedule proposed in the Government amendment tabled at Report stage (first day) of the Bill.
- HL Bill 139 (as amended on Report)
- Letter from Baroness Neville-Rolfe to Lord Hendy and Baroness Finlay regarding points on workers' rights made during the report stage debate (first day).
- Bill 311 2022-23 (Lords Amendments to the Bill)
- Bill 311 EN 2022-23 (Lords Amendments to the Bill)
- Programme motion, Consideration of Lords amendments in the CommonsView in Hansard ↗14 speakers · 35 speechesProgramme motion, Consideration of Lords amendments in the CommonsView in Hansard ↗30 speakers · 157 speeches
- Consideration of Commons amendments and / or reasons in the LordsView in Hansard ↗19 speakers · 35 speeches
- Legislative Consent Motion not approved by the Senedd on 6 June 2023
- Bill 319 2022-23 - Lords Non-Insistence, Disagreement, Agreement and Amendments in Lieu
- Motion withholding legislative consent agreed to by the Scottish Parliament on 8 June 2023
- Consideration of Lords message in the CommonsView in Hansard ↗15 speakers · 67 speeches
- Consideration of Commons amendments and / or reasons in the LordsView in Hansard ↗13 speakers · 20 speeches
- HL Bill 150 Commons Reasons
- Bill 330 2022-23 (Lords non-insistence and amendments in lieu)
